Comments on: Zimmerman: 13 Questions Searching for an Answer

By: As-Seduction.Ch

As-Seduction.Ch — Mon, 01 Oct 2012 10:49:42 +0000

Thank you for the good writeup. It in fact was a amusement account it.
Look advanced to more added agreeable from you! By the
way, how can we communicate?

By: Erica

Erica — Mon, 01 Oct 2012 03:36:13 +0000

Do anyone know why the small first aide kit was out at the location they found it? and why the tweezers were on top?

By: Erica

Erica — Mon, 01 Oct 2012 02:31:08 +0000

I don’t think the police would let him continue to bleed like that? it was left from the crime scene. Also no bleeding on police station video

By: gbrbsb

gbrbsb — Fri, 17 Aug 2012 09:39:06 +0000

tut… tut… Crane Station… control yourself! But he was such a pompous git wasn’t he? And I never got to tell him about the perimortem bruises forensics would have found on Trayvon’s knuckles, hand, etc. had he been punching and beating GZ as he claims.
(repeat as posted wrong place)

By: gbrbsb

gbrbsb — Fri, 17 Aug 2012 09:38:01 +0000

By: ajamazin

ajamazin — Thu, 16 Aug 2012 01:59:48 +0000

His right ear.

>________________________________ > From: Frederick Leatherman Law Blog >To: aja_young@ymail.com >Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 7:38 PM >Subject: [New comment] Zimmerman: 13 Questions Searching for an Answer > > > WordPress.com >KA commented: “Which ear did he have it on when the back of his head is photographed? I remember seeing him talking on a cell phone in the picture.” >

By: KA

KA — Wed, 15 Aug 2012 23:38:07 +0000

Which ear did he have it on when the back of his head is photographed? I remember seeing him talking on a cell phone in the picture.

By: TruthBTold

TruthBTold — Wed, 15 Aug 2012 17:14:53 +0000

Professor wrote,

“I recommend you take that affidavit and shove it up your ass.”

You generally keep cool, but this was definitely frustration building up. Clearly, this person was dedicated to trying to discredit you. Sounds kind of personal to me.

“In the end, you are what I have suspected all along: a troll dedicated to derailing thoughtful analysis and discussion under the guise of defending the presumption of innocence.”

“Therefore, I am banning you for your dishonest and unethical behavior.”

Yup yup. Thank you because he was beyond annoying and redundant.

By: TruthBTold

TruthBTold — Wed, 15 Aug 2012 17:05:02 +0000

@Crane-Station,

Wowza (lol). Don’t mess with her hubby and the truth. That person was very annoying and it was obvious that he was trying to discredit Professor Leatherman and make us question his legitimacy, if you will.

By: ajamazin

ajamazin — Wed, 15 Aug 2012 16:47:06 +0000

It was long overdue,

>________________________________ > From: Frederick Leatherman Law Blog >To: aja_young@ymail.com >Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 12:08 PM >Subject: [New comment] Zimmerman: 13 Questions Searching for an Answer > > > WordPress.com >masonblue commented: “By the way, I believe you knew the Supreme Court reversed the case due to prosecutorial and police misconduct and not ineffective assistance of counsel. I published an article in this forum on May 10th about the Stenson decision with links to the majorit” >